In philosophy class last year, we read an interesting story involving a moral dilemma. You are a visitor in the town of Omelas, an idyllic peaceful town where nothing seems to ever go wrong. The townspeople of Omelas are the same as us intellectually, only their society has practically no problems. Everything seems just right, except for one thing. In a deep dark cellar somewhere, there is a boy, locked away from the splendor above. He has been in the room for most of his life. he is small and frail for his age, for he is fed sporadically, and it is the only time he sees another human. Even with the little human contact he has, no one says a kind word to him; in fact, they usually yell at him, and give him a few kicks for good measure. He remembers a time when he used to be loved, so this abuse hurts him all the more.
Here’s the thing- everyone in town knows about this boy- most have in fact seen him in his locked cellar. But no one tries to help, for they know that if he is released, if anyone shows him kindness, the happiness and well being of Omelas will be destroyed.
Knowing all of this, would you like to live here, knowing that everyone’s happiness depends on the suffering of one person?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I live there now.
East Brunswick -- no The United States is Omelas. The little boy represents the sweatshop toilers of the third world countries. We have repressed him so far in our mind so we can attempt to live our lives worry-free. But sometimes some of us visit him. Maybe in our minds, we think of him in his ragged garb. Some even visit him. They witness the suffering that goes to make our clothing, our computers, our cars, our everything. But few walk away from Omelas. Why would they?
I don't walk from Omelas because I am selfish. I want to live my life in comfort -- even if it means I know that someone is suffering. In my defense, I say that being too selfless wouldn't really effect much. One person cannot end this suffering. But, its this exact mentality that has made the situation in Omelas so grave.
I remember reading this in comp this year! when we read it it was kinda shocking. They lock this poor child up bc he is everything bad that the people in omels do not want to face. He is the sadness, anger, hate, cruelity, and everything else that they locked up so that they could live in the happiness of omelas. This seems like a brilliant idea, but it isn't. Yes, it is great to be happy all thet time, but we need feelings like sadness and sympathy to show we care. At a funeral, are you going to be all jolly and happy? Or are you going to cry? When you see this poor child locked up in a cage are you going to smile? Or feel bad for the kid? We can't live off of happiness all the time. Other feelings must come out as well. I wouldn't want to live in omelas because it seems too good to be true, like a fairytale. Real life is no fairytale.
Honestly, that's what we're doing right now. Would you really believe me if I said "no i couldn't live there because it's cruel to the boy" when I live in a world where it's exactly the same? I mean our happiness exists because there are other countries that are suffering. If we stopped and tried to help others in need, then we wouldn't have as much money and luxury we have right now. And there are people who refuse to live in this kind of world and help those in need. It's just the whole world doesn't see it that way.
Post a Comment